Ranking
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 4:17 pm
The current ranking system shows some weaknesses.
News teams normaly loose matches, the get killed by loosing points and falling back behind newly created teams.
Inactive highly ranked teams returning at the peak only for playing a single match.
Is a team is born , it should play matches without get punished for loose matches.
So give them a single point for just playing a match. Its for the activity.
If a team win, it get at minimum of 24 points,or more like the present ratio.
Every team loose every weak 4 points. Teams starting with 1200 points after descending below 1000 points them reaching the status of inactive.
(team can not edited anymore, every member left that team automaticly). That means if a new team loose every match but play more than 4 matche a weak it stays at it was. Activity is a plus. Highranked but inactive team are descending.
Better teams having more time to avoid to reach the final status. (perhaps we introduce a bigger number for higher score).
News teams normaly loose matches, the get killed by loosing points and falling back behind newly created teams.
Inactive highly ranked teams returning at the peak only for playing a single match.
Is a team is born , it should play matches without get punished for loose matches.
So give them a single point for just playing a match. Its for the activity.
If a team win, it get at minimum of 24 points,or more like the present ratio.
Every team loose every weak 4 points. Teams starting with 1200 points after descending below 1000 points them reaching the status of inactive.
(team can not edited anymore, every member left that team automaticly). That means if a new team loose every match but play more than 4 matche a weak it stays at it was. Activity is a plus. Highranked but inactive team are descending.
Better teams having more time to avoid to reach the final status. (perhaps we introduce a bigger number for higher score).